17 Kasım 2016 Perşembe

13 Kasım 2016 Pazar

                                                                 Analysis of Citizen Kane
    Citizen Kane is a film shot in 1941 by Orson Walles; who is also its’ producer, co-author, director and star. The genre of the film is drama, at the same time mystery. This is because the film consists drama in the flashbacks of the characters, while the other characters actually try to solve the mystery of the main character’s last words: ‘Rosebud’.  This film has been nominated for Academy Awards in nine different categories. It has actually won one Academy Award for Best Writing (Original Screenplay) by Herman J. Mankiewcz and Welles.  By being a quasi-biographical (a film that describes real life, behind a façade of fiction), this film examines the life and legacy of Charles Foster Kane who is played by Orson Welles.
    The film starts with Kane Foster’s childhood, his separation from his parents and Colorado due to poverty. Through the film, the impacts on Charles; of being separated from his family and moving to New England  to live with Mr. Thatcher is depicted. Through the use of flashbacks; his story is narrated with the research of a reporter, who is trying to solve the mystery of Charle’s last words before he  dies.
To blend the settings, superimposition is used in the beginning of the film. This technique gives the feeling of continuity and shows that there is a relation/connection between the settings. This is the last scene, the scene where the sequence of superimposition ends. The sign that says ‘No Trespassing’ foreshadows the story of the character. It means that he has no way out of the life, he is designated to live. The ring fence further supports this sensation; that he is trapped and there isn’t a way out.
            
It continues with an establishing shot,           This is a wide shot which is used to show the setting and
 showing the big landscape which              the characters at the same time. Even without the existence
shows the  place where Charlie lives.      of Charlie, his big picture shows his significance to the movie.
   
    There are many scenes where Charlie Kane is shot with a low angle; whether a mid shot(first picture), long shot(second and third picture) is used. The use of long angle indicates his significance. These kinds of shorts are mostly used when he is speaking to the public. This is because of the fact that he was a candidate to become a president, and that makes him more important compared to the other characters in the scene who are just there to listen. He is also always placed in the center of the frame, which further supports the fact that he is important.
 
This is the scene where her mother gives Charlie away because she doesn’t want him to grow up in poverty and desires him to live a comfortable, rich life. During this scene, close-ups are used to demonstrate the feelings of characters. So it’s possible to see that the mother is sad and Charlie is angry.
      We see Kane through a window pane throwing snowballs, while Mr. Thatcher talks over a deal with the parents of Charles Kane. Normally the director would make the conversation be the main point in the frame by blurring the background but in this case, by the use of deep focus shot, we sympathize with Charles because he is the subject of conversation visually and literally.

 
   This is the scene which comes right after the one where Charlie leaves his own family. This is his only scene as a child in his new home. The high angle which is used to shoot young Charlie and the low angle which is used to shoot Mr. Thatcher, demonstrate the dominance and significance relation between them. Although Mr. Thatcher is shot with a lower angle(this shows that he has the authority); when it comes to placement  his position ,which is near the left edge of the frame, indicates that he is insignificant in the film. Oppositely, while Charlie is shot with a high angle which shows his lack of authority, him being positioned in the middle of the frame reveals the fact that he is important in the film.
There are two shots of the character Jed Leland. This shots are before a flashback( before he starts telling  a memory of him which is seen as a flashback ) and after the flashback. Before the flashback the character is shot with an eye level angle which shows that he is not significant, nor trivial. But after the flashback, when the audience learns that he was fired from the paper do to his nasty comments about Kane’s wife’s performance, his value directly decreases. That’s why after the flashback, he is continued to be shot with a high angle.
  The use of deep focus is again visible. In spite of the fact that Charlie is closer to the camera and more significant, Jed is equally visible due to deep focus.  This shows that Jed is in relation with Charlie. In this scene deep focus visually details the character’s thoughts and conflict by juxtaposing them relative to the rest of the scene.
 This shot is a high angle shot which depicts non-dominance of Kane’s wife. The shadow of Charlie covers half of his wife’s face, which shows his impact and power over his wife. Also the use of low key lighting helps the creation of drama in the scene and makes the audience feel uneasy.
  
   This is an example of an editing technique which is used a lot in this film, and is called superimposition. The different newspaper headings about the performance of Charlie’s wife are superimposed to Charlie’s face expression, and/or to his wife herself, plus to the audience. The music used in the scene, Kane’s expressions which are superimposed, and the sequence of the shots create an oppressive/ negative mood.
 This scene comes towards the end of the movie, when Kane has everything that money can buy and when he lives in a castle with his wife. This scene is very important in several ways. First it’s possible to say that this is a wide shot which shows the setting. When it’s observed, it’s easy to say that there is a lot of negative space, which depicts the character as powerless. The use of low key lighting again creates drama, by the use of shadows in the setting. The character is almost blended in the shadows, in a very large room; so it’s possible to say that the character is now lonely, within his own wealth.
Also, the use of echoes exist in this scene. While talking to each other Mr. Kane and his wife sometimes even can’t hear each other. This repeatedly stresses the truth which is, despite the fact that  they are living in a huge mansion , they are very lonely and isolated.
    Lastly, the sound design of the film is apparent. There are no internal sounds which mean that all sounds in the film are external. This indicates that there isn’t a major internal (psychological) conflict in the film.  Even though this is an old production, during the movie sounds are synchronous most of the time. In some particular scenes there are asynchronous sounds (ex: When the audience applauses Mr.Kane’s wife after her performance), yet this is only because lack of technology. Adding to this, ambient sounds can’t be heard, which shows that the technical aspects of the film is well managed.
    Throughout this film, the story of a boy who is separated from his parents is told. The film starts and ends with the scene that shows the “No Trespassing” sign, because there is no way that the character can change his life after being sent to New England. Only if he could stay in Colorado, he could have the chance to become a good person. With this shift, Charles fall from childhood innocence into the world of glamour, glitz and money. His face paced life cause him to hurt a lot of people and loose friends. And the word ‘rosebud’, which is tried to be understood throughout the film turns out to be the name of the sled that he used to play with when he was a little boy. (The same sled that he used to separate himself from Mr. Thatcher.)
    The use of the word ‘rosebud’ as his final words, reveals that he has lost his childhood innocence and became a bad person. The bad part of the film is that he realizes this too late, and after his deat rosebud is tossed into a fire and burned. So with his death, the only thing remaining from his childhood and representing his innocence is lost.




    

10 Kasım 2016 Perşembe