23 Aralık 2016 Cuma

LOLA- CINEMATOGRAPHY ANALYSIS


Requiem for a dream- Film Analysis

https://youtu.be/MaC2SHmfqkE


Requiem For A Dream
This scene starts with walking of Marion who worked as prostitute as a hidden job. Regret is a dominant feeling in this scene, so that light, costumes, music, shot etc. are based on showing them. 
The music at the background, which is a score of the film “Lux Aeterna” starts with the walking of Marion. It creates tension because at the scenes that audience hears this score creates tension and they know that something goes wrong. The shot is close up as a reason of showing the importance of her feelings and creating a regretful environment. She didn’t look the camera directly; she is keeping her eyes away from the camera like a child that did something bad. She is shameful of what did she done. The elevator’s light is flickering. It represent something is broken and goes wrong with her and her situation. Also, the color of the light is blue which is dominant color of the movie. The color blue is a great significance for depression and sadness. After, she goes out from the elevator and the building, flickering light effect continues with lightning. It displays that she can’t leave the regrets and secrets behind. They keep following her and it becomes her nature.  Another significance symbol of regret and shame are throwing up part of the scene. She knows that she did a wrong thing and even disgusted from herself, but it is a result of obsession of drugs.  It is connected with the upcoming scene, her shameful action related with Sara’s make-up scene. She is too old for doing that kind of a make-up, but is a reason of her obsession of being in the show, TV. She prepared for herself from the call till the end of the movie like this. Her make-up is shameful for her age. Also, she didn’t do her make-up properly. In the next scene, Marion comes to the house while the flickering light continues from the TV’s light. Harry is wearing a white t-shirt which represents that he is innocent in this situation because he is waiting for her girlfriend to come home while she is being prostitute.  
The main characters that are Marion and Harry placed as right and left sides to show distance and coldness in their relationship. The bars at the background show that they are stuck in vicious circle of their obsession.  The ful-2-shot, the bars and the fragment put the character in a prison environment. Again the lights are cold, blue and flickering because of TV. Also, TV is a requiring and important motif because it represents obsession of Harry’s mother and gives the flickering light affect in the scene. 


With a Soviet Montage technique of connection to the mother of Tyron and then Tyrone is showing feeling of regret. The medium long shot and the camera movement, zoom out, inform the reader about Tyrone’s situation and trouble. He is looking  at the picture of her mother deeply. As the camera moves farther, the audience gets the feeling better. He is sitting right side of the bed naked. Nakedness is a symbol of being innocent, defenseless and regret. He is feeling not protected because of he didn’t keep his promises. Also, the half of the bed is clean and the other part is untidy, like his thoughts. He feels regret because of the entire thing that he done but in the other hand he is addicted to it.  This scene is open frame because of the window, but he is sitting far away from the window. So, the distance between the window and him show that he is far from escaping his addiction. Also, even in the daytime, the lights are open as a reason of chance of escape is so low; he needs some sort of a help and support for it. One of the light’s colors is yellow the other one is white, which represents the challenges and differences in Tyrone. He turns back and looks out side of the window to think about the change as escaping. The right sides of the frame, the bars are still seen in the scene to impose the feeling of being trapped in drug. He doesn’t have any way to go out other than the window; he doesn’t have any solution to solve his trouble other than the healing.

    The scene where Sara is doing her make-up is juxtaposed right after the scene where Tyrone is looking at a picture of his mother. The reason for that is the mother-son relationship where Freud explains as ‘a classical psychoanalytic theory, the Oedious complex which occurs during the phallic stage of psychosexual development, where a boy’s decisive psychosexual experience is the Oedips complex-his son-father competition and for possession of mother. So while Tyrone is in his room looking at her picture, he is seeking the love of her mother. In contrast Sara has nothing to do with her son in the next scene, and this is obscene. This is a close up, because the feeling of Sara is important to demonstrate at that moment. She is in the middle of the scene and other prompts in the background are not clearly visible. This states her significance in the film. She has a clown like make up on, and this reveals the fact that her make-up is wrong along with everything else in the film. The use of red on her lips and on her dress symbolizes energy and danger; energy being the thing she has at that moment, and danger is the thing that she consists for herself. Also the use of superimposition gives a drunk like feeling which indicates that Sara is not herself. She is supposed to be a fine mother but she actually is a women with obsessions and disorders. The upcoming scene is a high angle wide shot. Combining this, with the fact that the character takes too little space in the scene, indicates that she is lost. The soft, insufficient lighting implies darkness. The open door of the closet and the messy bed indicates the disorder in Sara’s life. Additionally, the use of superimposition shows that she is delusional.


17 Kasım 2016 Perşembe

13 Kasım 2016 Pazar

                                                                 Analysis of Citizen Kane
    Citizen Kane is a film shot in 1941 by Orson Walles; who is also its’ producer, co-author, director and star. The genre of the film is drama, at the same time mystery. This is because the film consists drama in the flashbacks of the characters, while the other characters actually try to solve the mystery of the main character’s last words: ‘Rosebud’.  This film has been nominated for Academy Awards in nine different categories. It has actually won one Academy Award for Best Writing (Original Screenplay) by Herman J. Mankiewcz and Welles.  By being a quasi-biographical (a film that describes real life, behind a façade of fiction), this film examines the life and legacy of Charles Foster Kane who is played by Orson Welles.
    The film starts with Kane Foster’s childhood, his separation from his parents and Colorado due to poverty. Through the film, the impacts on Charles; of being separated from his family and moving to New England  to live with Mr. Thatcher is depicted. Through the use of flashbacks; his story is narrated with the research of a reporter, who is trying to solve the mystery of Charle’s last words before he  dies.
To blend the settings, superimposition is used in the beginning of the film. This technique gives the feeling of continuity and shows that there is a relation/connection between the settings. This is the last scene, the scene where the sequence of superimposition ends. The sign that says ‘No Trespassing’ foreshadows the story of the character. It means that he has no way out of the life, he is designated to live. The ring fence further supports this sensation; that he is trapped and there isn’t a way out.
            
It continues with an establishing shot,           This is a wide shot which is used to show the setting and
 showing the big landscape which              the characters at the same time. Even without the existence
shows the  place where Charlie lives.      of Charlie, his big picture shows his significance to the movie.
   
    There are many scenes where Charlie Kane is shot with a low angle; whether a mid shot(first picture), long shot(second and third picture) is used. The use of long angle indicates his significance. These kinds of shorts are mostly used when he is speaking to the public. This is because of the fact that he was a candidate to become a president, and that makes him more important compared to the other characters in the scene who are just there to listen. He is also always placed in the center of the frame, which further supports the fact that he is important.
 
This is the scene where her mother gives Charlie away because she doesn’t want him to grow up in poverty and desires him to live a comfortable, rich life. During this scene, close-ups are used to demonstrate the feelings of characters. So it’s possible to see that the mother is sad and Charlie is angry.
      We see Kane through a window pane throwing snowballs, while Mr. Thatcher talks over a deal with the parents of Charles Kane. Normally the director would make the conversation be the main point in the frame by blurring the background but in this case, by the use of deep focus shot, we sympathize with Charles because he is the subject of conversation visually and literally.

 
   This is the scene which comes right after the one where Charlie leaves his own family. This is his only scene as a child in his new home. The high angle which is used to shoot young Charlie and the low angle which is used to shoot Mr. Thatcher, demonstrate the dominance and significance relation between them. Although Mr. Thatcher is shot with a lower angle(this shows that he has the authority); when it comes to placement  his position ,which is near the left edge of the frame, indicates that he is insignificant in the film. Oppositely, while Charlie is shot with a high angle which shows his lack of authority, him being positioned in the middle of the frame reveals the fact that he is important in the film.
There are two shots of the character Jed Leland. This shots are before a flashback( before he starts telling  a memory of him which is seen as a flashback ) and after the flashback. Before the flashback the character is shot with an eye level angle which shows that he is not significant, nor trivial. But after the flashback, when the audience learns that he was fired from the paper do to his nasty comments about Kane’s wife’s performance, his value directly decreases. That’s why after the flashback, he is continued to be shot with a high angle.
  The use of deep focus is again visible. In spite of the fact that Charlie is closer to the camera and more significant, Jed is equally visible due to deep focus.  This shows that Jed is in relation with Charlie. In this scene deep focus visually details the character’s thoughts and conflict by juxtaposing them relative to the rest of the scene.
 This shot is a high angle shot which depicts non-dominance of Kane’s wife. The shadow of Charlie covers half of his wife’s face, which shows his impact and power over his wife. Also the use of low key lighting helps the creation of drama in the scene and makes the audience feel uneasy.
  
   This is an example of an editing technique which is used a lot in this film, and is called superimposition. The different newspaper headings about the performance of Charlie’s wife are superimposed to Charlie’s face expression, and/or to his wife herself, plus to the audience. The music used in the scene, Kane’s expressions which are superimposed, and the sequence of the shots create an oppressive/ negative mood.
 This scene comes towards the end of the movie, when Kane has everything that money can buy and when he lives in a castle with his wife. This scene is very important in several ways. First it’s possible to say that this is a wide shot which shows the setting. When it’s observed, it’s easy to say that there is a lot of negative space, which depicts the character as powerless. The use of low key lighting again creates drama, by the use of shadows in the setting. The character is almost blended in the shadows, in a very large room; so it’s possible to say that the character is now lonely, within his own wealth.
Also, the use of echoes exist in this scene. While talking to each other Mr. Kane and his wife sometimes even can’t hear each other. This repeatedly stresses the truth which is, despite the fact that  they are living in a huge mansion , they are very lonely and isolated.
    Lastly, the sound design of the film is apparent. There are no internal sounds which mean that all sounds in the film are external. This indicates that there isn’t a major internal (psychological) conflict in the film.  Even though this is an old production, during the movie sounds are synchronous most of the time. In some particular scenes there are asynchronous sounds (ex: When the audience applauses Mr.Kane’s wife after her performance), yet this is only because lack of technology. Adding to this, ambient sounds can’t be heard, which shows that the technical aspects of the film is well managed.
    Throughout this film, the story of a boy who is separated from his parents is told. The film starts and ends with the scene that shows the “No Trespassing” sign, because there is no way that the character can change his life after being sent to New England. Only if he could stay in Colorado, he could have the chance to become a good person. With this shift, Charles fall from childhood innocence into the world of glamour, glitz and money. His face paced life cause him to hurt a lot of people and loose friends. And the word ‘rosebud’, which is tried to be understood throughout the film turns out to be the name of the sled that he used to play with when he was a little boy. (The same sled that he used to separate himself from Mr. Thatcher.)
    The use of the word ‘rosebud’ as his final words, reveals that he has lost his childhood innocence and became a bad person. The bad part of the film is that he realizes this too late, and after his deat rosebud is tossed into a fire and burned. So with his death, the only thing remaining from his childhood and representing his innocence is lost.




    

10 Kasım 2016 Perşembe

16 Ekim 2016 Pazar

GERMAN EXPRESSIONISM-ART
    The expressionism movement appeared during the mid 1900s in Dresden and Munich paralleling the beginning of expressionism in France. One of its main influences was Van Gogh’s pioneering expressionist paintings. Unlike impressionists, who were all about imitating nature, the expressionist painters ‘typically distorted color, scale and space to convey their subjective feelings about what they saw’(Wilette).  Later on the war( World War 1), sacred most of the artists for good. So starting from 1915, German expressionism started becoming a protests movement, as well as it started becoming a style of ‘modern art’.
   Although expressionist painting is said to have originated with the British painterJMW Turner in 1755, it actually originated in Paris. In Autumn a group held an exhibition which was talked about across all Europe. Thus was the name Fauvism born.
   Simultaneously; a few German architecture students ,who are at the same time artists,  formed a group called Die Brucke, meaning the bridge. They looked at the same models for inspiration as Feuves namely: Van Gough, Paul Gaugin and Georges Seurant. “Die Brucke early embodied the aesthetics of, German Expressionism, a movement which would reshape abstract as well as representational art”(Wilette).
    As it’s recently stated, Die Brucke consisted four architecture students: Ernst Ludwig Kirchner, Karl Schmidt-Rottluff , Fritz Bleyl and Erich Heckel. They aimed to attract all the revolutionary and innovative in order to win the freedom to create, for the next gerenation.
Their subjects were taken from their everyday surroundings and their works were representing their daily life. Their paintings were directly painted with life and experience itself. Their artistic point of view directly came from the exhibitions which traveled around Europe and consisted many works of Van Gogh. “What was at first intuitively transformed into art, was refined into a powerfully expressive art composed of a simplified tracery of lines, composition over large surfaces and pure color”(Wilette). Landscape, the nude, the nude in a landscape were important themes for Die Brucke.
http://www.theartstory.org/images20/works/die_brucke_4.jpgStanding Child- Eric Heckel:
Naturalness and exaggeration offered possibilities of overcoming traditional boundaries. The artists wanted to depict universality and objectivity, that’s why color was made independent.
In this drawing, the pose of the girl indicates that she is not ashamed of her nakedness. Her skinny immature body, provides a visual analog for the artist’s angularity and simplification form.









 - 192.4 koErnst Ludwig Kirchner (1880):

This is a piece where freedom is stated with the use of color. And again nudity is visible. There is not much contrast in Kirchner’s work yet the use of bold and bright colors, is the main idea of this painting. Her comfortable position again represents lack of shame because of nudity. Plus the existence of the mirror strengthens this meaning by representing that she is comfortable by observing her naked body.











http://www.thearttribune.com/local/cache-vignettes/L290xH242/DB-Kirchner-A_la_terrasse_du_cafe-c277b-a64a6.jpg
 Ernst Ludwig Kirchner-At The Café Terrace:
This is most likely drawn close to the year 1915. That’s because, it represents the darkness and obscurity, which are all about the Great War. The color use (black and white) illustrates the contrast of the society or maybe even the challenges of the artist’s inwardness. Additionally, it’s possible to observe the sharp edges of the women’s clothing, which contributes to the idea of contrast.




http://www.visualnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Pechstein-Killing-ofthe-Banquet-Roast-19121.jpgMax Pechstein- Killing of the Banquet Roast:
The human figure with the sharp edges of its body, plus the tree figure with its unfamiliar illustration demonstrates innovation and modernism. This is another painting with striking, bold colors. The green, yellow and flesh-color are used to illustrate naturalism and freedom. While the contrast of colors attract attention, the use of black in the background but especially in the tree’s roots depict depression.





 The article written by Jeanne Wilette is a secondary source, which consist all this information about art and German expressionism. This is obviously written to inform the reader about the German Expressionism, how it formed and further information of the things that came with it. Personally I found this article quite beneficial, for the reason that it provides the necessary information about German Expressionism and arts.

                                                                        Work Cited
       Derain., By French Fauvist Andre. "History of Expressionist Painting (1880-1930)." History of Expressionist Painting. Encyclopedia of Arts and History, n.d. Web. 09 Oct. 2016. <http://www.visual-arts-cork.com/history-of-art/expressionist-painting-origins.htm>.
      Christina.tsevis. "The Bridge to Utopia: Die Brücke's Wild Expressionism." Visual News. Visual News, 03 Mar. 2016. Web. 09 Oct. 2016. <https://www.visualnews.com/2012/06/04/bridge-utopia-expressionist-group-die-brcke-early-20th-century/>.
      "German Expressionism." MoMA. Moma, n.d. Web. 09 Oct. 2016. <https://www.moma.org/explore/collection/ge/themes/index>.